top of page

tRump Presidency Receiving $7M+ from Foreign Governments; divided by Missing Top Secret Documents = ???



The recent revelation that the businesses of former President Trump received at least $7.8 million in payments directly from at least 17 foreign governments throughout his presidency has raised significant concerns and implications. The payments were made to Trump's businesses, including hotels and properties, by foreign governments such as China, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and India. These transactions have sparked controversies and discussions about potential conflicts of interest, ethical considerations, and legal implications.


The impact of these payments extends beyond financial matters, touching on constitutional, ethical, and foreign policy issues. The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits the President from accepting "any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State" without the consent of Congress.


The report released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee suggests that these payments may have violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause.


Trump's refusal to divest from his businesses and the decision to leave the day-to-day business operations to his sons during his presidency have raised concerns about the potential for the President and his family to profit from the presidency by accepting rent payments and hotel stays at Trump properties.


The largest spender at Trump properties was the government of China, spending over $5.5 million at Trump Tower and Trump International Hotels. Notably, Trump chose not to impose sanctions on a Chinese bank that was alleged to be helping North Korea avoid sanctions, and the bank was paying Trump approximately $7 million in rent at Trump Tower. Similarly, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates also made substantial payments to Trump's businesses, raising questions about the relationship between these payments and specific foreign policy decisions made during Trump's presidency, such as arms deals and foreign visits.


Further implications arise from the lack of transparency and potential ethical violations related to these financial transactions. The incomplete data presented in the report and the controversy surrounding the release of the documents indicate the need for further investigation and accountability. The involvement of foreign governments in direct financial transactions with the ex-president's businesses during his time in office underscores the importance of ethical standards, conflicts of interest, and the impact of such transactions on diplomatic relations and foreign policy decisions.



The indictment of former President Donald Trump on federal charges of willfully retaining documents containing national defense information, refusing to return them, and obstructing related investigations represents a historic and highly consequential development. The gravity of the charges, which include 37 felony counts, is compounded by the significance of the documents and their potential national security implications.


The alleged mishandling of secret documents by Trump, including hoarding top secret government documents, displaying them to visitors, and attempting to hide them from investigators, has far-reaching legal, political, and security implications. The indictment points to the apparent volume of evidence amassed by prosecutors and the severity of the allegations, raising concerns about the potential risks to national security if the classified records were exposed.


The sensitive nature of the documents retained by the former president, as well as the shockingly insecure locations where they were allegedly held, poses grave national security implications. The choice of the Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, to store and transport these documents, including information on defense and weapons capabilities, vulnerabilities to military attacks, nuclear programs, and plans for retaliation, underscores the severity of the security breach.



The indictment also includes 31 counts lodged under the Espionage Act, reflecting the classified nature of the documents and their potential impact on U.S. national security.


The markings on the documents, including indications that the information was derived from human intelligence (HUMINT), underscore the sensitivity and the potential implications of compromising such intelligence.


Additionally, the disappearance of a binder containing highly classified information related to Russian election interference at the end of Trump's presidency has further raised alarms about the exposure of closely guarded national security secrets. The missing intelligence, which has not been found since Trump left office, highlights the potential risks associated with the mishandling and loss of classified materials.


The comprehensive investigation into the missing documents, their potential exposure, and the implications for national security underscores the critical importance of safeguarding classified information and upholding the rule of law.


The criminal case against Trump and the legal processes that follow will be a crucial test of democratic institutions and their commitment to enforcing laws, upholding national security, and holding accountable those entrusted with sensitive documents and intelligence.


In conclusion, the revelations about the financial transactions and the mishandling of top secret documents during Trump's presidency carry wide-ranging implications for constitutional, ethical, legal, and national security considerations. These developments underscore the importance of transparency, accountability, and the rule of law in upholding the integrity of public office and safeguarding national security interests.


9 views
bottom of page