top of page

The Oxymoronic efforts of United States Assistance to Israel in the Israel-Hamas Conflict

Updated: Nov 16, 2023

The Israel-Hamas conflict is a deeply complex and longstanding one, characterized by a multitude of perspectives and narratives. The involvement of the United States in aiding Israel's war against Hamas has generated intense debate and controversy. Some argue that this assistance further endangers Palestinian civilians, creating an oxymoronic situation. In this article, we will explore the intricacies of this issue and shed light on the various factors at play.

To understand the dynamics between the United States, Israel, and Hamas, it is crucial to examine the historical context. The U.S. has been a longstanding ally of Israel, rooted in shared democratic values and strategic interests. This alliance has influenced the U.S.'s position in the Israel-Hamas conflict, leading to its support for Israel in various ways.

One key contributing factor behind the U.S. assistance to Israel in the conflict is Israel's security. Hamas, is a classified terrorist organization by the U.S., and has launched countless rocket attacks targeting Israeli civilians. The U.S. views its aid as a means to help Israel defend itself against these threats and maintain its security.

Another aspect to consider is the United States' role as a global power broker. By supporting Israel, the U.S. seeks to maintain its influence in the region, ensuring stability and promoting its interests. This often involves a delicate balance between supporting Israel's security needs while also advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

However, the United State's aid to Israel for their defense efforts, is essentially empowering Israel militarily to only further harm Palestinian civilians caught in the crossfire. The conflict has resulted in a significant loss of life and infrastructure on both sides.

Aren't these oxymoronic efforts? Let's not forget that the United States is also providing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, emphasizing the need for their well-being amidst the conflict. It seems futile to aid Israel's military since it will ultimately result in accelerating humanitarian concerns in Gaza, thus needing to supply more humanitarian aid.

The United States, along with the international community, should focus energy and aid in advocating for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The U.S. should strongly engage in diplomatic efforts to encourage negotiations between the parties involved. The U.S. should advocate for a more strategic approach in efforts to eradicate Hamas, and assist in the implementation of a democratic government for the Palestinian people. The goal should be to achieve lasting peace that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.

The U.S. aid to Israel in its conflict with Hamas is complex and multifaceted issue, and it is essential to consider the various factors at play. But we can't get around the idea that the assistance is seen as contradictory due to the harm it's causing to Palestinian civilians, though recognizing that the U.S. involvement is driven by a combination of security concerns, diplomatic considerations, and a commitment to finding a peaceful resolution.

Moving forward, it is important for the international community to continue advocating for a just and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that ensures the security of both Israelis and Palestinians while respecting their rights and aspirations.



bottom of page